KUZEY KIBRIS TÜRK CUMHURİYETİ’NDE POLİS MESLEK AHLAKI BÜTÜNLÜĞÜ: ADLİ POLİS MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ POLİS MENSUPLARININ ALGISI

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018- 67
Language : Türkçe
Konu : null
Number of pages: 509-528
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı KKTC’deki Adli Polis Müdürlüğü polis mensuplarının polis meslek ahlakı bütünlüğü algılarını keşfetmektir. Çalışmada KKTC Polis Örgütünden yazılı izin alınmıştır. Klockars ve arkadaşları tarafından geliştirilen “polis meslek ahlakı bütünlüğü (polis meslek etiği) algılama anketi”nin ikinci versiyonu, KKTC’ye uyarlandıktan sonra 2013 yılı Aralık ayında Adli Polis Müdürlüğünde görevli polis mensuplarına uygulanmıştır. Anket verileri SPSS-20 istatistik programına aktarılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde aritmetik ortalama, mod, yüzde gibi betimleyici analizler; sıralama, eşli örneklemler t-testi, ki-kare testi, spearman korelasyonu gibi ilişkisel ve fark analizleri kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre; senaryolarda tasvir edilen alkollü meslektaş kazasını rapor etmeme, tutukluya vurma, tutukluya vuran meslektaşlarını durdurmama ve esnaftan bedava yiyecek, içecek kabulü; en az ciddi görülen, en hafif disiplin işlemini gerektirdiği düşünülen ve büyük olasılıkla sessizlik kodu tarafından üzerinin örtüleceğine inanılan polis uygunsuz davranış türleri olarak değerlendirilmektedirler. Diğer taraftan, senaryolarda tasvir edilen olay mahallinden çakı hırsızlığı, komisyonculuk ve yalan yere resmi rapor düzenleme; en çok ciddi görülen, bu davranışlarda bulunan polis mensuplarının meslekten çıkarılmasını gerektiren ve sessizlik kodu tarafından güçlü bir şekilde desteklenmeyeceğine inanılan polis uygunsuz davranış türleri olarak değerlendirilmektedirler. Katılımcılar, Müdürlüklerindeki disiplin işlemlerini; amirin, memurunu özel işlerinde kullanması davranışına karşı hafif; geri kalan davranışlara karşı adil olarak algılamaktadırlar. Çalışma, katılımcıların en az ciddi olarak değerlendirdikleri davranışlarda sessizlik kodunun daha fazla güçlü olduğunu, en çok ciddi olarak değerlendirdikleri davranışlarda ise sessizlik kodunun daha fazla zayıf olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Ayrıca çalışma, Adli Polis Müdürlüğünde görevli polis mensuplarının yarıdan fazlasının, alkollü meslektaş kazasını rapor etmeme, tutukluya vurma ve çocuk istismarı zanlısını döven meslektaşlarını durdurmama davranışlarının, resmi kuralların ihlali olup olmadığından emin olmadıklarını ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore police officers’ perceptions about police integrity in the TRNC Criminal Investigation Directorate. In this study, written consent was obtained from the TRNC Police Organization. The second version of the police integrity questionnaire, developed by Klockars and colleagues, was adapted for the TRNC context, and then administered to the police officers employed in the Criminal Investigation Directorate in December 2013. Survey data were transferred to and analysied with SPSS-20 statistical program. Descriptive analysis, such as mean, mode, percentage, and correlational and differences analysis, such as rank, paired-t test, chi-square test, and Spearman’s correlation were used in data analysis. According to the results of the survey, police officers evaluated the actions of not reporting the colleague-involved DUI accidents, striking a prisoner, failing to halt beating a prisoner, and the acceptance of free meals and gratuities as the least serious forms of police misconduct, which require the most lenient disciplinary sanctions, and the most likely to be covered by the code of silence. On the other hand, police officers evaluated theft from a crime scene, kickback, and the falsification of the official report as the most serious forms of police misconduct that require dismissal of the police officer, and lacking strong support by the code of silence. Respondents perceived their directorate’s disciplinary actions for misconduct by a supervisor as lenient, while they rated for the rest of the scenarios as fair. The strength of the code of silence were also measured. It was found that the code was closely upheld for the behaviors evaluated as the least serious, and most weakly followed for the behaviors evaluated as the most serious. The study revealed that more than a half of the police officers in the Criminal Investigation Directorate were unsure whether cover-up of police DUI accident, striking a prisoner, and failing to halt beating a child abuser behaviors violated the official rules.

Keywords


  • Barker, T. & Roebuck, J. B. (1973). An Empirical Typology of Police Corruption, Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.

  • Goldstein, Herman. (1975). Police Corruption: A Perspective on its Nature and Control, Washington, DC: The Police Foundation.

  • Goldstein, Herman. (1977). Policing a Free Society, Cambridge: Ballinger.

  • Hickman, Matthew J. et al. (2016). Expanding the Measurement of Police Integrity, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(2), pp. 246267.

  • Kayabaşı, Osman. (2017a). The Contours of Poli- ce Integrity in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, (Edited by A. Temizer & S. Özer). in II. International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies (Symposium Book- Social Sciences) Volume I, 18-21 May 2017, Rome/Italy (pp. 153193) Ankara: Gece Kitaplığı.

  • Kayabaşı, Osman. (2017b). Police Integrity in the

  • Kayabaşı, Osman. (2017c). Police Integrity in the Traffic Directorate Police Officers’ Perceptions, (paper presented at the III. International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies, 10-11 November 2017 Ankara/Turkey.

  • Klockars, Carl B. (1999). Measuring Police Integ- rity, Videotape presented at The Research in Progress Seminar, Final Report Submitted to the United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, U.S.A.

  • Klockars, C. B. & Kutnjak Ivković, S. (1999). ‚The Measurement of Police Delinquency,‛ (Edited by Williams S. Laufer and Freda Adler) in The Criminology of Criminal Law: Advances in Criminological Theory, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, Vol.8, pp. 87–106.

  • Klockars, C. B. & Kutnjak Ivković, S. (2004). ‚Measuring Police Integrity,‛ (Edited: Matthew J. Hickman, Alex R. Piquero & Jack R. Greene), in Police Integrity and Ethics, Belmont: Wadsworth.

  • Klockars, Carl B. et al. (2000). The Measurement of Police Integrity, Research in Brief, United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

  • Klockars, Carl B. et al. (2004a). The Contours of Police Integrity, (Edited by C. B. Klockars, S. Kutnjak Ivković & M. R. Haber

  • Klockars, Carl B. et al. (2004b). The Contours of feld) in The Contours of Police Integrity (pp. 1-18), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Klockars, Carl B. et al. (2006). Enhancing Police Integrity, New York: Springer.

  • Knapp Commission. (1972). Knapp Commission Report on Police Corruption, New York: Knapp Commission Report.

  • Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja. (2005). Fallen Blue Knights, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja. (2015). Studying Police Integrity, (Edited by S. Kutnjak Ivković

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S. & Haberfeld, M. R. (2015a). Measuring Police Integrity Across the World: Studies from Established Democra

  • Kutnjak Ivković, S. & Haberfeld, M. R. (2015b). A Comparative Perspective On Police and M. R. Haberfeld) in Measuring Police Transition (pp. 329-368), New York: Springer.

  • Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja et al. (2013). Rainless West: The Integrity Survey’s Role in Agency Accountability, Police Quarterly, 16(2), pp. 148–176.

  • Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja et al. (2015). Police Integ- rity in the United States, (Edited by S. Kutnjak Ivković and M. R. Haberfeld) in cies and Countries in Transition (pp. 295327), New York: Springer.

  • Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja et al. (2016a). An Empiri- cal Test of the Influence of Society at Large on Police Integrity in a Centralized Police System, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(2), pp. 302-318.

  • Lim, H. & Sloan, J. J. (2016). Police Officer Integrity: A Partial Replication and Extension, Policing: An International Jo39(2), pp. 284-301.

  • Lobnikar, Branko et al. (2016). The Code of Silence and Female Police Officers in Slovenia: Gender Differences in Willingness to Report Police Misconduct, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(2),

  • Mollen Commission. (1994). New York City Commission to Investigate Allegations of Police Corruption and the AntiCorruption Procedures of the Police Department. New York: Commission Report.

  • National Institute of Justice. (2009). The Use-of- Force Continuum, Accessed January 20, 2015. http://www.nij.gov/topics/lawenforcement/officer-safety/use-offorce/Pages/continuum.aspx.

  • Pennsylvania Crime Commission. (1974). Report on Police Corruption and the Quality of Law Enforcement in Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania Crime Commission Report.

  • Porter, L. E. & Prenzler, T. (2016). The Code of Silence and Ethical Perceptions: Exploring Police Officer Unwillingness to Report Misconduct, Policing: gies & Management, 39(2), pp. 370-386.

  • Roebuck, J. B. & Barker, T. (1974). A Typology of Police Corruption, Social Problems, 21(3), pp. 423–437.

  • Rosenbaum, Dennis P., (2016). Special Issue on Police Integrity: An Introduction, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 39(2).

  • Valmüür, Birgit. (2016). Exploring Gender- Neutrality of Police Integrity in Estonia, Policing: An International Journal of pp. 401-415.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics