@article{2014,title={COMPARISON OF SENTENCE ANALYSIS AND PHONICS-BASED SENTENCE METHODS IN READING-WRITING IN THE LIGHT OF TEACHERS OPINIONS (SAMPLE OF TOKAT PROVINCE)},abstractNode={The purpose of this study is to compare sentence analysis method and phonics based sentence method included in Turkish training programs in the light of teachers' opinions. Reading speed and reading comprehension skills, writing skills, basic differences between the two methods, advantages and limitations of these methods emerges as sub-problems. The sample is selected as a kind of non-random sampling methods named as purposive sampling method. The features of teachers are being experienced in teaching profession at least 20 years and using both methods at least one. Semi-structured questionnaire including 7 questions is used as data collection tool, 5 experts opinions are taken in order to ensure the content validity of the questions. Reading speed and comprehension skills are faster to the students trained by using sentence analysis method, no difference in writing skills in both methods but difficulty in handwiriting for students and teachers are among the findings. The basic difference between these two methods is identified as phonics-based sentence method arises from induction principle while sentence analysis method originated in deduction and therefore in sentence analysis method the students who are in the concrete operational step can percept the concepts more easily. In the future, other stakeholders like parents, school administrators and students' opinions can be taken into consideration to discover which method is more usable and to take necessary precautions in the field of literacy.},author={Fazilet Özge MAVİŞ-- Ömer ÖZEL - Mehmet ARSLAN},year={2014},journal={The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies}}